Friday, December 2, 2016

Augmented Reality as Rhetoric and Composition

(Shows a Player about to catch a Spearow.)

Pokemon Go is an augmented reality game that became very popular recently. In the game, the player can catch and collect fictional creatures called Pokemon using Pokeballs. With these creatures, the player can fight in gyms with other Pokemon to gain experience points and receive awards. It’s considered an augmented reality game because it uses maps to show the player’s current surroundings like streets, pathways, monuments, etc. As the player walks down the street, the view of the map changes and eventually the player will encounter wild Pokemon to catch.

Pokemon Go is rhetorically effective for two reasons. First, the interactivity elements in the game helps a person to move around and explore its surroundings. The player is inclined to venture to new places to catch Pokemon available only in those geographic areas and travel to Pokestops where the person can receive Pokeballs to continually catch Pokemon. It uses GPS to generate a geographical map as the main view of the game and this helps the game to be more realistic. It is important to mention that the interactivity element must be relevant to the goals of the game, or it will dilute the effectiveness of the persuasion. As Bogost argues, “the closer we get to real experience, the better.” He is directly referring to the vivid spectrum. He’s implying that the steps involved in the games is what makes it rhetorically influential. 

However, there were unintended consequences to Pokemon Go. Since the release of Pokemon Go, there has been robberies and fatal car accidents. These instances became so frequent that the Pokemon Company International and Niantic, Inc. released a statement saying: “We are aware that some incidents have occurred involving fans playing Pokemon GO. We encourage all people playing Pokemon Go to be aware of their surroundings and to play with friends when going to new or unfamiliar places.” The company took further action by adding messages in their games like this shown below. 


 (The company added pop-up messages in the game app for their players
 so they will not put themselves or other people in harm's way)

The second reason is the identification element in the game. In the beginning of the game, the player can design the appearance of his or her character in the game. The character will not look exactly like the player but it starts the subconscious process of the player placing themselves as the character into the game. 

In conclusion, Pokemon Go is a rhetorically influential game because it has elements of procedural and identification. 

Source: 
-Bogust's Procedural Rhetoric

Check out these blogs!


Saturday, November 5, 2016

A social media plan for Personalized Medicine




Purpose: To make an expert research article on Personalized Medicine go viral.

Instructions
1.       Create a popular version of the expert research article.
·         Provide a summary that highlights the key points of the research article. It needs to be adapted so your non-expert audience will understand. It should at least include the description of personalized medicine and its benefits.
o   Description
§  Keep it simple. Don’t use scientific terms that may confuse the reader. Remember your audience is not an expert.
§  Example:
·         A medical treatment adapted to YOUR DNA and body type.
·         It looks at your medical history to determine the best treatment for the disease.
o   Benefits
§  Minimizes adverse side effects, better outcome predictability, save millions of dollars, preventive strategy, increase mortality rates, improved health care confidence, sustainability, and etc (Anaya 2016).
§  Extremely useful for cancer patients that have like breast cancer, kidney cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, and leukemia (What 2016).
2.       Post your popular article on websites with specific communities (strong ties).
·         Examples of websites: Cancers Fighters Thrive, Cancer Today Magazine, Women’s Health, etc
o   This is an emerging technology that most people don’t know about but everyone knows cancer. So we will use that to connect with our readers. Also cancer is a serious disease and if there a new and better treatment then people are going to want to share the good news and their friends, and loved ones.
o   This will increase the chances of it spreading “because they share a common niche interest that is worth celebrating” (Nathan and Hemsley p29).
3.       Create a video and post it on Facebook.
·         Video
o   Make a one to two minute video.
o   Begin with statistics on cancer then bring in personalized medicine.
§  Examples of statistics (from National Institute for Health)
·         An estimated 595,690 people will die from cancer in 2016
·         Most common cancer include breast cancer, kidney cancer, leukemia, and lung cancer.
·         By 2020, national expenditures could rise to $156 billion
o   Include key benefits of personalized medicine (not all), pictures, testimonials of cancer patients and doctors, and link to the popular article (in bit.ly format).
·         Facebook
This is the best platform because you can promote the video so it has a better chance of staying at the top of the news feed. It also has a chance of circulating to communities with weak ties. According to Nathan and Hemsley, “Research shows that individuals are more likely to receive novel ideas from weak ties than from strong ties.” 

·         Post
o   Ask to post on Facebook pages like Breast Cancer Awareness, Breast Cancer Site, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, Stand Up To Cancer, American Society of Clinical Oncology, etc
o   Use hash tags—a great way to reach out to even more people
§  People can search for hash tags in the search bar at the top of Facebook page

§  Examples:  #BreastCancer, #Leukemia, #CancerSurvivors, #CancerChat, #CancerFreeMe, #BeatCancer (very popular), #breakthroughs, #cancersucks

4.       Conclusion.
·         After a couple of weeks to a month, develop a scatter chart with a moving average trendline to see results. (X-axis = Date, Y-axis = Views) This will
·         Using Nathan’s and Hemsley’s definition of virality, determine whether it went viral or not. (If it meets ALL four of these requirements, then it did go viral.)
a)       Social sharing
b)      Sharp acceleration
c)       Reach-by-numbers
d)      Reach-by-networks


Check out these other blogs!


Sources:
Anaya, J., Duarte-Rey C., Sarimiento-Monroy, J.C., Bardey, D., Castiblanco, J., & Rojas-Villarrage, A. (2016). Personalized medicine. Closing the gap between knowledge and clinical practice. Autoimmunity Reviews, 15(8), 833-842. Doi:10.1016/i.autry.2016.06.005

Keogh, B. (2012). Era of Personazlied Medicine May Herald End of Soaring Cancer Costs. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 104(1), 12-17.

Nathan, Karine; Hemsley, Jeff, Dec 06, 2013, Going Viral Willey, Oxford: 9780745675480
(Nathan and Hemsley).

What is Personalized Cancer Medicine? Retrieved November 04, 2016, from http://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/how-cancer-treated/personalized-and-targeted-therapies/what-personalized-cancer-medicine

A social media plan for Personalized Medicine




Purpose: To make an expert research article on Personalized Medicine go viral.

Instructions
1.       Create a popular version of the expert research article.
·         Provide a summary that highlights the key points of the research article. It needs to be adapted so your non-expert audience will understand. It should at least include the description of personalized medicine and its benefits.
o   Description
§  Keep it simple. Don’t use scientific terms that may confuse the reader. Remember your audience is not an expert.
§  Example:
·         A medical treatment adapted to YOUR DNA and body type.
·         It looks at your medical history to determine the best treatment for the disease.
o   Benefits
§  Minimizes adverse side effects, better outcome predictability, save millions of dollars, preventive strategy, increase mortality rates, improved health care confidence, sustainability, and etc (Anaya 2016).
§  Extremely useful for cancer patients that have like breast cancer, kidney cancer, lung cancer, melanoma, and leukemia (What 2016).
2.       Post your popular article on websites with specific communities (strong ties).
·         Examples of websites: Cancers Fighters Thrive, Cancer Today Magazine, Women’s Health, etc
o   This is an emerging technology that most people don’t know about but everyone knows cancer. So we will use that to connect with our readers. Also cancer is a serious disease and if there a new and better treatment then people are going to want to share the good news and their friends, and loved ones.
o   This will increase the chances of it spreading “because they share a common niche interest that is worth celebrating” (Nathan and Hemsley p29).
3.       Create a video and post it on Facebook.
·         Video
o   Make a one to two minute video.
o   Begin with statistics on cancer then bring in personalized medicine.
§  Examples of statistics (from National Institute for Health)
·         An estimated 595,690 people will die from cancer in 2016
·         Most common cancer include breast cancer, kidney cancer, leukemia, and lung cancer.
·         By 2020, national expenditures could rise to $156 billion
o   Include key benefits of personalized medicine (not all), pictures, testimonials of cancer patients and doctors, and link to the popular article (in bit.ly format).
·         Facebook
This is the best platform because you can promote the video so it has a better chance of staying at the top of the news feed. It also has a chance of circulating to communities with weak ties. According to Nathan and Hemsley, “Research shows that individuals are more likely to receive novel ideas from weak ties than from strong ties.” 

·         Post
o   Ask to post on Facebook pages like Breast Cancer Awareness, Breast Cancer Site, Cancer Treatment Centers of America, National Cancer Institute, American Cancer Society, Stand Up To Cancer, American Society of Clinical Oncology, etc
o   Use hash tags—a great way to reach out to even more people
§  People can search for hash tags in the search bar at the top of Facebook page

§  Examples:  #BreastCancer, #Leukemia, #CancerSurvivors, #CancerChat, #CancerFreeMe, #BeatCancer (very popular), #breakthroughs, #cancersucks

4.       Conclusion.
·         After a couple of weeks to a month, develop a scatter chart with a moving average trendline to see results. (X-axis = Date, Y-axis = Views) This will
·         Using Nathan’s and Hemsley’s definition of virality, determine whether it went viral or not. (If it meets ALL four of these requirements, then it did go viral.)
a)       Social sharing
b)      Sharp acceleration
c)       Reach-by-numbers
d)      Reach-by-networks

Check out these other blogs!
Bryce: http://pwrbb.blogspot.com/2016/11/plan-for-diffusion-through-social-media.html
Damian: draymondwritinginrhetoric.blogspot.com
Sources:
Anaya, J., Duarte-Rey C., Sarimiento-Monroy, J.C., Bardey, D., Castiblanco, J., & Rojas-Villarrage, A. (2016). Personalized medicine. Closing the gap between knowledge and clinical practice. Autoimmunity Reviews, 15(8), 833-842. Doi:10.1016/i.autry.2016.06.005

Keogh, B. (2012). Era of Personazlied Medicine May Herald End of Soaring Cancer Costs. JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 104(1), 12-17.

Nathan, Karine; Hemsley, Jeff, Dec 06, 2013, Going Viral Willey, Oxford: 9780745675480
(Nathan and Hemsley).

What is Personalized Cancer Medicine? Retrieved November 04, 2016, from http://www.cancer.net/navigating-cancer-care/how-cancer-treated/personalized-and-targeted-therapies/what-personalized-cancer-medicine

Friday, October 7, 2016

Visual Rhetorical Analysis of Comics



Here is a visual rhetorical analysis of  "The Amulet." I used one of McCloud's arguments to analyze the rhetoric in the graphic novel. It's in the form of a video on YouTube and make sure to go to the settings to click on "CC" for captions.

McCloud's argument in "The Amulet"


Check out these blogs too!

Bryce: pwrbb.blogspot.com
Damian: draymondwritinginrhetoric.blogspot.com

Friday, September 23, 2016

Procedural Rhetorical Analysis of 'The Game of Life'

g of l husband.jpg
(The picture shown above shows a scene in the Game of Life.)
We used the Game of Life as an example to illustrate Bogost’s procedural rhetoric and its principles. Traditionally, people like to use the actual game board edition but we used the kindle version of the Game of Life instead. It is a semi-realistic game about walking through life events and the purpose of the game is to accumulate the most wealth.
The main argument of the game is that the choices made in the early stages of one’s life will have a ripple effect throughout the remainder of their journey. This will determine what choices are available to them  and how one will lead his or her life until the end. One example of early choices affecting the rest of your life is the game’s opening decision to either go to college or start a career. Starting a career allows you to make money early on and avoid having to pay large amounts of student debt. However, choosing to go to college presents higher paying jobs with more perks.
Further, the main argument of the game is life has many unpredictable ups and downs. The Game of Life does an excellent job of showing how unpredictable events can really affect your course of existence. For example, the event of having a child (or twins) comes at random and can then make the rest of the game very expensive. Other events such as having a midlife crisis, having your house flood, or alternatively getting a promotion at your job all cause disruption, frustration, and surprise to players. One can also say that some aspects of life is based purely on chance because of it. There is just no way to expect what events will interfere or benefit in our lives.
The elements of procedurality in the game helps one understand the process of life. The Game of Life helps by laying out the general route a person can take. It begins with the choice of attending college/university or pursuing a career, getting married, buying a house, starting a family, and other achievements until retirement. Nevertheless, in between these events there are unexpected misfortunes. In the game, the players must use the spinner and this really aids with the randomness of when these unforeseen events can happen in real life. This helps the game to be more realistic. In addition, if it is combined with the best interactivity possible then it moves even closer to real experience. It is important to mention that the interactivity element must be relevant to the goals of the game, or it will dilute the effectiveness of the persuasion. As Bogost argues, “the closer we get to real experience, the better.” He is directly referring to the vivid spectrum. However, he doesn’t mean it has to be virtual or to completely recreate the world to be persuasive; he’s implying that the steps involved in the games is what actually makes it rhetorically influential.
Another element is the idea that early choices affect the rest of one’s life is reinforced by the player’s freedom within the parameters of the game. There are decisions that present players with very specific choices; those choices then define how later events are carried out. Players are forced to deal with what happens, just like people in the real world are forced to deal with real situations.
Overall, we believe there is procedural rhetoric in the Game of Life because there is some seriousness in the nature of life, but it’s not clear to us if it’s strong enough to “support or challenge our understanding of the way things in the world do or should work” as Bogost might say to be effective.


Check out these other cool blogs!


Saturday, September 10, 2016

Traditional Rhetorical Analysis: Hilary Clinton's op-ed on Deseret News




As the presidential election nears, every candidate is trying to sell themselves in these last crucial days. Recently, Hilary Clinton, a prominent presidential candidate, wrote an op-ed titled “What I have in common with Utah leaders” for Deseret News.  In my opinion, I think her op-ed piece is quite persuasive to her readers. To thoroughly analyze it, I will be using Kenneth Burke’s Dramatism to examine her op-ed.
In Clinton’s op-ed piece, she is trying to win over Utah’s vote since it is a Republican state and she is a Democrat. However, the agency that she uses to achieve her purpose is quite intriguing. She mentions both distinguished Latter-Day Saint members or leaders and history of the Mormon church. In fact, Hilary mostly puts a spotlight on these people by quoting what they said. For an example, “Listen to Mitt Romney, who said Trump “fired before aiming” when decided a blanket religious ban was a solution to the threat of terrorism.” Romney is a distinguished member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Saints, and he was the Republican candidate for the presidential election back in 2012. Since he is so well-known and respected, Clinton cited him because the LDS members will listen to him, even if they do not listen to her. Other than Romney, she quotes Senator Larry Pressler who became a LDS member a year ago and gave a lecture series at Brigham Young University. In his statement, he said that “Trump’s plan reminded him of the Missouri Governor who singled out Mormons in his extermination order of 1838.” Additionally, she mentions significant Latter-Day Saint church leaders like Sister Rosemary Wixom, Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, Gordon Hinckley, and Thomas Monson. Even though she doesn’t reference it directly, Hilary Clinton utilizes the values of The Family: A Proclamation to the World issued by the church. For instance, she says phrases like “keep kids and parents together” and “every child can reach his or her God-given potential.” She is definitely trying her best to appeal to the Mormon community in Utah.
If the scene was different, would Hilary still say the things she did in her op-ed on Deseret News? The answer would be no. If the scene switched to the Democratic National Convention, her talk will be completely changed and she would employ a different kind of agency. Overall, her op-ed piece was quite persuasive to the Mormon readers because of the rhetorical techniques that she applied.


Check out these other rhetorical blogs!: